| Why
bother to filter web content? Some users still argue
that filtering software is some form of censorship and it
is a staff prevention
technology rather than a money-saving one. The facts, however,
paint a very different picture.
Being
paid to waste time! It is estimated that in the
UK alone companies are losing £9.6bn a year due to employees
surfing the Internet on company time. Recent findings revealed
that 44 per cent of Britons with Internet access at work spend
three hours a week on average browsing the Web for personal
interest.
Quote 1
"It is also estimated that a company with ten employees
earning an average of £19,500 will lose more than
£12,000 a year through Internet abuse, based on employees
spending 30 minutes a day on non-work-related surfing,"
says Bob Jones, managing director of Equnnet.
Quote 2
"They are finding out that the Big Brother show is
costing UK industry well over £1m every week through
lost productivity of staff logging on to the site. Issues
like this, bandwidth costs and potential litigation from
employees distributing controversial content has spurred
on the market for Web filtering products from a niche to
a volume market," says Barry Mattacott, marketing
manager ofe92plus.
Staff versus security Some
would pose the question: So what if a few people do spend
their time watching a bit of Big Brother or checking the latest
football results? But these activities can have serious repercussions
for a business.
Quote 3
"Many employees are spending an unreasonable amount
of time viewing content on the Internet which is unrelated
to their work It has many implications Bandwidth/network
usage by employees accessing unrelated work items reduces
the speed at which vital
business information is accessed," says Raj Panesar,
Northern European marketing manager at Clearswift.
"Also, system downtime increases
due to large amounts of files being downloaded and systems
failing due to lack of resources There is also loss of productivity
through either system downtime or
employee non-productive activity," he adds.
But it is not just security threats
that need to be countered with web content filtering. In
an era of tribunals and sackings for sending and receiving
indecent material, there are the other legal considerations
for firms.
Quote 4
"Companies have a requirement to provide a safe working
environment for their staff where they are not exposed to
abusive or explicit content. Employing filtering software
helps protect the company network from abuse or misuse,
ensuring it runs efficiently," says SurfControl's
Corbelli.
SOME
WEB CONTENT SURFING STATISTICS
The average cost of one hour
per day of non-business browsing on the Internet, or cyber-slacking,
for every 1,000 employees is £6,000,000 per annum,
or 12.5 per cent of the company wage bill (Websense Web
site)
A 5Mb attachment of a Joke
screensaver consumes the same bandwidth as 160 plain text
e-mails (Websense Web site)
70 per cent of pornography
is downloaded during the 9 to 5 working day and 30 to 40
per cent of surfing during those hours is not business related.
More than 60 per cent of on-line purchases are made during
working hours (Websense Web site)
Getting rid of the gossip,
jokes and other unproductive e-mail from colleagues can
save up to 30 per cent of the time an employee spends reading
e-mail (Gartner Group, 8e6 Technologies Web site)
56.5 per cent of employees
feel that surfing the Web or sending non-work-related e-mails
decreases productivity, and 31 per cent of employers said
they restrict employee Internet/e-mail usage (Vault.com
survey)
37.1 per cent of employees
said they surf the Web constantly at work, 31.9 per cent
said a few times a day, 21.3 per cent said a few times a
week, and only 9.7 per cent said never (Vault.com survey)
Employees earning £50,000-£65,000
are twice as likely to download pornography at work than
those earning less than £23,500 (eMarketer.com)
|